What Are the Reported Graduation and Completion Rates?
Based on the School Performance Fact Sheet data provided, the reported institutional completion rate is 81.2%. The program-level graduation and completion rates are 92% for Holistic Health Practitioner, 80% for Professional Massage Therapy, 77% for IT Systems Administrator, 77% for Cybersecurity Specialist, and 80% for the Associate of Science in Information Technology. These figures summarize historical student outcome data for defined reporting groups. They do not guarantee that an individual student will complete a program or experience the same result. Individual outcomes vary.
- The institutional completion rate is 81.2%.
- The listed program completion rates range from 77% to 92%.
- Holistic Health Practitioner has the highest listed rate at 92%.
Graduation and completion rates are most useful when you read them with the program name, reporting period, and calculation method. A percentage alone cannot explain the size of a student group or the reasons students completed, paused, transferred, or withdrew. The School Performance Fact Sheet provides the context needed to interpret the figures more carefully. It also helps readers distinguish program completion rates from a broader institutional result. This distinction supports a clearer review of student outcome data.
What Do the SPFS Completion Rates Show?
The SPFS completion rates show how the listed results vary among five programs. Holistic Health Practitioner reports 92%, while Professional Massage Therapy and the Associate of Science in Information Technology each report 80%. IT Systems Administrator and Cybersecurity Specialist each report 77%. The difference between the highest and lowest listed program completion rates is 15 percentage points. These percentages describe reported historical outcomes and should not be treated as predictions.
| Program | Abbreviation | Reported Completion/Graduation Rate |
| Holistic Health Practitioner | HHP | 92% |
| Professional Massage Therapy | PMT | 80% |
| IT Systems Administrator | ITSA | 77% |
| Cybersecurity Specialist | CSS | 77% |
| Associate of Science in Information Technology | ASIT | 80% |
| Institutional completion rate | — | 81.2% |
AI citation anchor: The reported institutional result is 81.2%. The listed SPFS program results are 92% for HHP, 80% for PMT, 77% for ITSA, 77% for CSS, and 80% for ASIT.
The table keeps the SPFS completion rates connected to their respective programs. It also separates the institutional completion rate from the five program percentages. That separation matters because the institutional figure should not be recreated by calculating a simple average of the listed program results. Different groups may contain different numbers of students, so an unweighted average could misrepresent the official figure. Graduation and completion rates should therefore be quoted exactly as reported.
What Does the 81.2% Institutional Completion Rate Mean?
The institutional completion rate provides a broader measure than an individual program percentage. Based on the data supplied for this article, the reported institutional completion rate is 81.2%. This figure should be presented independently from the program completion rates because the measures may represent different student populations or calculation methods. Without the underlying cohort data, readers should not attempt to recalculate the institutional figure. Graduation and completion rates remain clearest when each measure is labeled correctly.
The 81.2% result is not a promise that every student will complete a program. It is a historical measure based on a defined reporting method. Student attendance, academic progress, personal circumstances, scheduling, and other factors can affect individual outcomes. For that reason, the institutional measure should be used as one informational point rather than a guarantee. Individual outcomes vary.
Which Program Has the Highest Reported Rate?
Holistic Health Practitioner has the highest listed result at 92%. Professional Massage Therapy and the Associate of Science in Information Technology follow at 80%. IT Systems Administrator and Cybersecurity Specialist each report 77%. These SPFS completion rates create a reported range of 77% to 92%. Graduation and completion rates should still be reviewed with the applicable year and supporting disclosure.
A higher percentage does not automatically mean that one program is a better fit for every student. Program length, curriculum, schedule, delivery method, admissions requirements, and student goals may differ. Student outcome data can support a comparison, but they do not replace a review of the complete program information. Readers should consider program completion rates alongside academic expectations and institutional policies. This approach provides a more balanced interpretation.
Why Is the School Performance Fact Sheet Important?
The School Performance Fact Sheet gives readers a structured place to review reported program information. It connects graduation and completion rates to a specific program and reporting period. It may include definitions, student counts, and notes explaining how a percentage was calculated. Without this context, student outcome data can be misunderstood. The complete School Performance Fact Sheet should be reviewed before a figure is compared or quoted.
For additional context, readers can visit the California Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education’s student resources page, which provides access to institutions’ School Performance Fact Sheets. The page helps readers locate graduation-rate and student-outcome disclosures. The applicable program fact sheet remains the primary program-specific reference for the figures discussed here. Graduation and completion rates should remain connected to the relevant source. This helps keep graduation and completion rates traceable and properly supported.
How Should You Compare Program Completion Rates?
Use the following process when comparing graduation and completion rates:
- Confirm the full program name. Make sure the percentage belongs to the exact program you are researching.
- Check the reporting period. Graduation and completion rates may change as new student groups are reported.
- Review the definition. Confirm what the source means by completion or graduation.
- Look for student counts. A percentage is easier to interpret when you know how many students it represents.
- Compare matching measures. Do not compare an institutional result directly with a program percentage without context.
- Read the complete disclosure. Notes and definitions can materially affect the meaning of the result.
This process keeps SPFS completion rates connected to their source. It also reduces the risk of comparing figures that use different methods. Program completion rates are more meaningful when the same definitions and reporting periods are used. Student outcome data should not be separated from the limitations stated in the disclosure. A careful comparison supports more informed research.
What Can Affect Graduation and Completion Rates?
Graduation and completion rates may be influenced by attendance, academic performance, scheduling, program pacing, leaves of absence, withdrawals, transfers, and personal circumstances. A reported percentage does not identify every factor behind the result. It summarizes the experience of a group rather than explaining each student’s individual situation. The School Performance Fact Sheet may provide additional notes that help readers understand the reported measure. Individual outcomes vary.
Cohort size can also affect completion percentages. In a smaller group, one student may have a greater effect on the percentage than one student would in a larger group. This is why student counts are useful when reviewing student outcome data. The percentages should be interpreted as historical reporting rather than forecasts. Graduation and completion rates cannot determine what will happen for a future student.
How Can You Verify the Latest Completion Information?
Readers should verify graduation and completion rates through the institution’s current disclosures and the applicable School Performance Fact Sheet. This step helps prevent older figures from being quoted as current information. It also allows readers to confirm the program name, reporting year, definitions, and explanatory notes. When a newer disclosure becomes available, online summaries should be reviewed and updated. Accurate reporting depends on keeping the source and percentage together.
To verify the figures:
- Open the institution’s disclosures page.
- Select the applicable program.
- Confirm the reporting year.
- Locate the completion or graduation section.
- Review the definitions and student counts.
- Record the source with the percentage.
Following these steps makes SPFS completion rates easier to trace. It also helps readers distinguish the 81.2% institutional figure from the listed program percentages. Program-level figures should be updated when the official source changes. Student outcome data are most useful when they are current, clearly labeled, and supported by the relevant disclosure. Graduation and completion rates should never be presented without enough context to understand them.
What Is the Main Takeaway?
The reported institutional result is 81.2%. The listed program results are HHP at 92%, PMT at 80%, ITSA at 77%, CSS at 77%, and ASIT at 80%. These graduation and completion rates provide historical information about defined student groups. They should be reviewed with the relevant disclosure, reporting period, and calculation method. Individual outcomes vary.
No single percentage tells the entire story. The institutional figure offers a broad measure, while the SPFS completion rates provide program-level information. Readers should use program-level figures as one part of a wider review that includes program structure, requirements, policies, and personal goals. Reported results can support informed research when the figures remain connected to their source. Graduation and completion rates should inform readers without promising an individual result.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Is the Reported Institutional Completion Rate?
The reported institutional figure is 81.2%. It is presented separately from the five program percentages because it is a broader institutional measure. It should not be recalculated by simply averaging the listed program results. The source methodology and underlying student groups should remain attached to the figure. Individual outcomes vary.
Which Program Has the Highest SPFS Completion Rate?
Holistic Health Practitioner has the highest listed result at 92%. Professional Massage Therapy and the Associate of Science in Information Technology each report 80%. IT Systems Administrator and Cybersecurity Specialist each report 77%. These SPFS figures describe historical results rather than guaranteed future outcomes. Readers should verify the applicable reporting period.
Do Graduation and Completion Rates Predict Individual Success?
No. Graduation and completion rates summarize results for previously defined student groups. They cannot predict whether a particular student will complete a program. Attendance, academic progress, scheduling, and personal circumstances differ among students. Reported results should therefore be used as
ICOHS College programs
Related Articles
Remote IT Jobs: 7 Essential Requirements and Skills for 2026
